![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. When will the Wireless Internet products be available? The Wireless Internet services will be live and available once all testing has been completed, the Wireless Corporation public shell has been funded to launch the IPO (Initial Public Offering) and, obviously, once the Corporation's staff infrastructure has been put in place. 2. How does this Wireless Internet compare to other Wireless services? This Wireless Internet service does not compare to any other Wireless service. 3. Where will the Wireless Internet first go live in Canada? Specific areas and/or time-frames for the wireless services to go live in Canada have not been provided as of yet. 4. Where will the Wireless Internet first go live in the USA? The Wireless Corporation anticipates that complete USA-wide coverage of all 50 States, and all of the Canadian Provinces, will take approximately one (1) year to complete from the date the services are first launched. 5. What countries will the Wireless products be available in? The initial Countries to receive the Wireless products are the United States and Canada. 6. What signal frequency does the Wireless Internet product work on? The frequencies the wireless services are broadcast on are held as confidential information by the Wireless Corporation at this time. 7. How well will the Wireless Internet products work in mountains? The minimum signal strength distance target in mountainous terrain is no less than sixteen (16) miles. Update: ALL mountainous terrain testing has been successfully completed. Although signal strength distance exceeds the 16 mile target distance - the precise figures have not been officially released. 8. Will the Wireless Corporation’s "Services" interfere with any television, radio, satellite, phone, wireless microphone, or "white space" signals that are already in use? No! The frequencies in use with the Wireless Corporation's Services will not cause any interference to any public airwaves already in use. 9. What will I need in order to use the Wireless Internet on my laptop? The Wireless Corporation will provide the modem equipment for residential and office connection of desktop computers at no charge, which will allow for laptops to connect in the home or office by using the USB or Ethernet adaptor port on the laptop. 10. How fast are T1, T2, and T3 Wireless Internet connections? These numbers indicate how much data can be sent and received per second, which are best explained through comparisons. 11. Is there a difference between the Wireless IP Telephony and VoIP? Yes there is a difference, however, IP Telephony is the same as VoIP (Voice-over Internet Protocol) in that they both operate by sending data via the Internet. 12. How much are the Wireless services going to cost? The projected monthly fee for the T1 Wireless Internet service is anticipated and has been stated to be $19.95 per month. 13. What is the stock symbol and name of the Wireless Corporation? The Wireless Corporation's stock symbol, and the Stock Exchange it will be trading on, will not be released until the IPO (Initial Public Offering) is offered to the general public. 14. How can I invest in the Wireless Internet project? With seven private investment bankers secured in 2003, no further funding is being sought after or accepted. 15. Can I speak to a live person about the Wireless Internet project? The Wireless Corporation will not provide any method of contact until the wireless services go live, the Wireless Corporation's staff infrastructure has been trained and put in place, and the IPO (Initial Public Offering) has been made available. 16. Is there any current support for the Branded ISPs that have pre-registered? ISPs who have pre-registered through PrivateBrandedISP.com will be kept apprised of news items as they become available through the Updates page on this web site. Once the wireless services launch, the Branded ISPs will be provided with a special and private channel of communication with the Corporate Reseller. 17. How can your mobile technology challenge the monopoly which the cellular industry has over a global population - especially now that third generation (G3) networks provide broadband connectivity for the smartphone? The mobile technology can accomplish what cellular technology can only aspire to - and that is: to provide broadband Internet access to the masses regardless of where that access is needed. It will be a ubiquitous signal. Any perusal of a Telco Network coverage map will show the patch work of system access is largely concentrated in urban areas but with vast rural areas remaining unserviced. Cellular technology is limited by the need to tradeoff the size of any Cell area with the number of subscribers accessing the Network within that Cell area - at any one time. Thus, these Cell areas are very small in the urban centers (perhaps one [1] square mile) to service thousands of subscribers - and therefore require many repeater transmitters in these subscriber concentrated areas in order to extend Network coverage. Although cellular technology is wireless - cellular carriers still have to deal with ‘last mile' issues that hamper the ADSL and cable networks. It still comes down to the economics of 'supply and demand'. They all have to justify the expense of network expansion weighed against the profitability of gaining new subscribers in any given area. This mobile wireless technology can transmit the Internet connection signal over 30 miles (slightly less in mountainous terrain) before it needs to hand over to the next transmitter - AND regardless of the number of subscribers connecting simultaneously. This 30 mile figure is a radius - which means EACH transmitter can cover over 3,000 square miles (8,000 square kms). Therefore, population/subscriber density makes no difference to this mobile wireless technology - so transmitter placement is basically determined by range of transmission. A conservative estimate (when you crunch the numbers) would indicate perhaps 6,000 repeaters to provide ubiquitous coverage throughout the entire North American continent. By comparing this to the millions of cellular repeater towers needed to achieve equivalency of bandwidth, coverage and mobility - it’s like believing true communications convergence can be achieved through a proliferation of class 1 trunk roads that are merely functionally adequate for mass produced smartphones. There really is no comparison - especially when you consider this Internet technology will facilitate a new phase in the evolution of corporate, institutional and technical enterprise (to name a few) that will greatly benefit from a truly ubiquitous, mobile, super high speed Internet infrastructure. 18. I don't believe your claims. The physics make it impossible. Of course, the 'proof is in the pudding'. This will be a mute point after the technology goes 'live'. The real issue is whether an ISP will gamble their business integrity upon their certainty that this mobile technology is impossible. As with any technological breakthrough, the mind of the inventor sees things differently than the status quo mind. So, the reason this mobile technology has received patents is (believe it or not) - because nobody else has done this before. Once it goes 'live' - competitors will see how it works - in principal. Then they will have to innovate the technology (or discover an entirely new technology) in a way that does not infringe upon the patents. Then they will have to gamble the billions of dollars and 3+ years needed to develop, test and bring their patented technology (it will have to be patented) to the market. So two questions need to be asked: As an ISP, do I have the resources to make that gamble? Given the nature of disruptive technologies - i.e. the speed of their deployment and adaptation in modern times - will I still be in business if I take that gamble? 19. Is the Branded ISP Program exclusively for businesses who already provide Internet access? No. The reason for a Private Branded ISP Program is to provide a mechanism for established ISPs to retain their customer base. It is not the intention of the Wireless Corporation to wipe out existing ISPs. The fact is: this is a disruptive technology and as such will have an unavoidable and predictable impact upon all communication modalities. Added to this is the nature of viral marketing inherent within a global community already unified through the Internet and Cellular technology. Proactive businesses can capitalize upon this technology through the Branded ISP Program as 'the first adopters'. These businesses are typically the 'already established' Internet Service Provider. However other businesses (classified as Internet Solution Providers) will quickly follow suit because the Branded ISP Program makes it very simple for these companies to provide this mobile wireless Internet access in addition to their inventory of preexisting products and services. The whole notion of what constitutes an ISP will rapidly morph from a specialized service into an added convenience or benefit for any company, organization, or entity who has an existing clientele, membership or user base to whom they can offer this mobile wireless Internet access. Since subscription rates will be set by the Wireless Corporation (with products, services and connectivity germane to the network), companies will grow on the basis of offering their own products and services to the public to gain market share. 20. The entrenchment of the Telcos and the evolution of the Mobile Phone (especially in consideration of its success in bridging the 'digital divide' between 1st and 3rd world populations) is too extensive, too deep to be seriously affected by this 'new' technology. Why would the masses need your Mobile Internet when web-enabled smartphones operating on rapidly proliferating 3G (soon 4G) Networks provide beyond what could possibly be needed? In the final analysis, the ability to communicate better, faster and more completely is hampered by the weakest link. The last hundred years has demonstrated that technology is evolving communication modalities in a multiplicity of ways - and this dynamic is happening better, faster and more completely than ever before. For example: the invention of the automobile supplanted the horse and carriage as the preferred mode of transportation - and this adaptation fueled the need to build better roads, different kinds of roads and more of them. This better infrastructure of roads facilitated a more sophisticated evolution in the automobile - with more diversity and more of them - and so on. When you critically analyze the state of the Information Superhighway - a good way to gain an accurate perspective of how much better it could get - is to ask why a device such as the OQO (www.oqo.com) is not more pervasive than it is right now? The answer to this question has to do with the fact that the present Internet Infrastructure has a limited ability to handle such a device. It’s like owning a Ferrari but you can only really experience its full potential if you find a closed circuit racetrack - or go to Germany and drive it on the Autobahn. Sure, not everybody finds it practical or even has a need to drive a Ferrari - but the improved quality of roads has facilitated a general evolution in the diversity, functionality and quality of the automobile. So, it's the old question of 'which came first, the chicken or the egg?'. No matter which answer you lean toward, the fact is: mobility, performance and sophistication of devices will not significantly progress without the strong link to a corresponding quality Internet infrastructure - upon which they may operate to their fullest potential. Why would you want to drive a horse and carriage on a Motorway or Highway? If you knew such roads existed - and they were everywhere - yet you still persisted in driving your horse and carriage while Ferrari after Lexus after Hummer after Minivan after ‘Pocket Rocket’ are blowing your wheels off (with their cost cheaper than operating your horse and carriage) - how long would it take for you to wise up? The fact is: smartphone manufacturers will retool to offer devices that are functional as desktop computers in order to stay in business. The micro technology already exists - and just like any other mass produced item - demand will reduce their costs for the mass market.
|
|
|
|
[BMWISP] [ISP Register] [FAQs] [Updates] [Network] |
|
This Web page has been developed and is maintained exclusively by Geoffrey Crutchley an Independent Affiliate Member of ItsYourNet, LLC. This Web page is not authored, sponsored, and/or maintained by ItsYourNet, LLC, and in the event ItsYourNet, LLC may or does modify its products, programs, and/or its policies, information contained on this page is subject to change. |